The McCord Report - Philosophical Commentary on Current Events
The Grinder - Copyright JimMcCord.com The Grinder - Copyright JimMcCord.com
Author's Note 06/21/2004

A psychology of childish warfare follows: under which self-righteous soft minds are quick to regard disagreements with themselves as dire issues of right versus wrong. This one-sided selfishness is typically associated with religious eagerness to reach judgments of "evil."

An abused concept of "faith" furthermore allows righteous types to believe uncritically whatever story they wish to be "factually" true.


DANGEROUS BELIEFS

In 1950 Eric Hoffer's masterpiece, THE TRUE BELIEVER, identified a grave threat to civilization posed by soft-minded troublemakers. It originates in their susceptibility to mind-closing belief systems. They range, for example, along an ideological spectrum from self-righteous preachers and pundits to bomb-throwing anarchists.

In Hoffer's day the worst troublemakers were probably left-wingers. These days they tend to cluster as a lunatic fringe on the far "right" wing.

His catchy phrase has become universally useful though, whatever the era, for colloquially designating dangerously childish types among us; starting with outright criminals.

Eric Hoffer - the True Believer

They all selfishly substitute personal deductions from preconceived belief systems for realistic thinking; which entails tough-minded but empathetic appraisal of ever-changing human conditions. Beguiling belief was notably called a "lower" mental faculty in Plato's Riddle of the Line (introduced at the close of Book 6 REPUBLIC). It tends to drown out our "higher" faculties of reason and understanding.

Weak minds are especially drawn to this trap for the unwary. The true believer can become thus a self-appointed messiah--resolving to "correct" humanity--typically in the name of God.

BUSH VERSUS ''EVILDOERS''

The President's war rhetoric has been pathologically primitive. It derives, of course, from the sharp scriptural distinction between good and evil. They have become "separate things" in our religious lexicon. All three western religions have consequently blown evil out of proportion as an overwhelming "force" in-itself. It supposedly infects humans inherently.

Each western religion sports a set of Holy Scriptures prescribing institutional controls and pieties more or less designed--naively-- to exorcise inherent evil altogether. (Superstitiously.) Fundamentalists in all three allege that the Old-Testament God "personally" authored their scriptures. They start fighting though about the authenticity of conflicting claims that the two younger religions share and/or supplant the "chosen-elect" entitlement of Hebrews alone to receive these special messages.

Fundamentalist fury is righteously aroused further, toward violence, by doctrinal disagreements about Divine intent supposedly disclosed in particular passages of older and younger scripture.

Crusaders

Artist Unknown

The war of words and projectiles periodically intensifies--ironically-- around the Holy city of Jerusalem; increasingly dragging in the rest of a world held "hostage" to the fuss.

Come on now, people. This massive illogic is downright silly. "Faith" is transformed from a generic wellspring of universal hope into an excuse for wishfully believing fanciful hearsay told by religious "authorities."

The real enemy is fundamentalism itself. The brunt of its "absolute" that we are inherently evil can be turned around under more flexible suggestions from classical philosophy based on Natural Law. Consider notably the emphasis on education in Plato's REPUBLIC. It enables a more realistic assessment of ourselves as mainly immature.

Obviously the human species is quite young. We are saddled with bodies of yearning flesh exploding with animal impulses. We are only slowly learning to control them. In the meantime they lead inevitably to injustice and what we have been calling "evil" ways.

One logical alternative to fundamentalism would balance evil--against the manifestly stronger "force" of love--toward more maturity in living the Good Life; which all people want most down deep. The balance could be sealed with our naturally-imposed conscience. Genuinely humanitarian efforts to educate suffering populations accordingly about these tools of nature, and help better their condition, would obviously proceed further toward peace than brute force deployed to exterminate "evildoers."

It is recommended therefore that President Bush appeal more pragmatically to a compassionate core of all major religions; beneath whatever veneer of righteous belligerency.

His brand of "Christianity" currently neglects a deeper message of love and forgiveness; which could be instrumental in achieving a New Republic.

It waits for folks to simply grow up and administer rationally the marvelous institutional framework that has been established over the centuries.

Closeup of "Buffalo Valley" by Jim McCord

Everything needed for Plato's Good Life is now available; once humans realize that only the old war (within and) among ourselves stands in the way of a really Brave New World . . .


© Jim McCord
June 21, 2004


Email Jim McCord
mac@jimmccord.com

Return to
JimMcCord.com Home Page


.